top apps for mobile devices including for iOS and Android operating systems It has been the recipient of numerous awards including App of the Year in 2011 from Apple Inc and is currently the third most downloaded app for iOS phones worldwide

s trademark See Pfizer Inc v Asia Ventures Inc WIPO Case No D2005-0256 See also Ansell Healthcare Products Inc v Australian Therapeutics Supplies Pty Ltd WIPO Case No D2001-0110 stating t he incorporation of a Complainant s well-known

worldwide through Amazon.com Inc and through Apple Inc s App Store iv to date videos related to Five Nights at Freddy s have YouTube views exceeding 30 billion viewers v Mr Cawthon and the Complainant have established a high degree of consumer

and industrial products including food Complainant's shopping app at one point was listed in the Top 20 popular apps on both the Google Play Store and Apple App Store�the only shopping-related app to make the list In addition Complainant's

FORUM � � DECISION � Apple Inc v Xiamen Jianfa Xinxi Jishu Youxiangongsi 143434 / Xiamen Jianfa Xinxi Jishu Youxiangongsi Claim Number FA2002001882879 � PARTIES Complainant is Apple Inc Complainant represented by Georges Nahitchevansky of

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION � Apple Inc v sheng jun / Sheng Sheng Claim Number FA2002001883240 � PARTIES Complainant is Apple Inc Complainant represented by Georges Nahitchevansky of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP New York USA.� Respondent is

3.0 states that f rom the inception of the UDRP panelists have found that the non-use of a domain name including a blank or ‘coming soon page would not prevent a finding of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will

PANEL DECISION Payoneer Inc v Jurgen Neeme Case No D2020-0137 1 The Parties The Complainant is Payoneer Inc United States of America United States represented by SafeNames Ltd United Kingdom The Respondent is Jurgen Neeme Estonia 2 The Domain

� DECISION � Apple Inc v Heng Szu Tan Claim Number FA2001001879261 � PARTIES Complainant is Apple Inc Complainant represented by Rita Weeks of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP New York USA.� Respondent is Heng Szu Tan Respondent Philippines �

FORUM � � DECISION � Apple Inc v Evelyn Seidman Claim Number FA1912001875767 � PARTIES Complainant is Apple Inc Complainant represented by Georges Nahitchevansky of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP United States of America.� Respondent

and receiving numerous awards including App of the Year in 2011 from Apple Inc Currently the Complainant s app is the third most downloaded app for iOS smartphones worldwide according to applications information company App Annie and the

FORUM � � DECISION � Apple Inc v zhang guangyong Claim Number FA1911001872985 � PARTIES Complainant is Apple Inc Complainant represented by Georges Nahitchevansky of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP California USA.� Respondent is zhang

PANEL DECISION WhatsApp Inc v Luis Raffael Sanchez De La Cruz Case No D2019-2485 1 The Parties The Complainant is WhatsApp Inc United States of America the United States represented by Hogan Lovells Paris LLP France The Respondent is Luis

Take-Out LLC v Versimedia Inc WIPO Case No D2012-1668 held Ordinarily if the face of the complaint itself demonstrates a settled reason why the complaint must be denied a panel may make a finding of RDNH See Liquid Nutrition Inc v

de dominio es 1&1 IONOS Inc 3 Iter Procedimental La Demanda se presentó ante el Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI el Centro el 2 de octubre de 2019 El 3 de octubre de 2019 el Centro envió a 1&1 IONOS Inc por correo electrónico

in Compl Ex I After founding Apple Mr Jobs served in executive leadership and chief advisory roles at Apple for about 24 years total Mr Jobs supervised the rollout of successful Apple products such as the iPod Apple iTunes Store iPhone and iPad

PANEL DECISION Facebook Inc WhatsApp Inc v Wisdom King Wizindo Case No D2019-2517 1 The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc and WhatsApp Inc the Complainant United States of America United States represented by Hogan Lovells Paris LLP

Advance Magazine Publishers Inc v Arena International Inc Caso OMPI No D2011-0203 F Hoffmann-La Roche AG v Onotole Vasermane Caso OMPI No D2010-2074 y Minerva S.A v El Yanko Caso OMPI No D2018-0767 De hecho la incorporación del término

the registrants identity ies including pseudonyms ii the registrants contact information including email address es postal address es or phone number s including any pattern of irregularities iii relevant IP addresses name servers or webhost s iv

FORUM DECISION � Dell Inc v Milen Radumilo Claim Number FA1910001866172 � PARTIES Complainant is Dell Inc Complainant represented by S Erik Combs Texas USA.� Respondent is Milen Radumilo Respondent Romania � REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN

See e.g Document Technologies Inc v International Electronic Communications Inc WIPO Case No D2000-0270 B Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel initially addresses the question of whether the Complainant has established common law trademark or

Heaven Hill Distilleries Inc v Domains By Proxy LLC / Carolina Rodrigues Fundacion Comercio Electronico Case No D2019-2080 1 The Parties Complainant is Heaven Hill Distilleries Inc United States of America �United States � represented by Wyatt

PANEL DECISION WhatsApp Inc v Domain Registrar Proxy Name Services LLC Case No D2019-2102 1 The Parties The Complainant is WhatsApp Inc United States of America �United States � represented by Hogan Lovells Paris LLP France The Respondent is

en disputa es 1&1 IONOS Inc 3 Iter Procedimental La Demanda se presentó ante el Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI el �Centro � el 26 de julio de 2019 El 29 de julio de 2019 el Centro envió a 1&1 IONOS Inc por correo electrónico

found where domain name incorporated complainant s entire mark and added one letter and the term inc which is commonly known as the abbreviation for incorporated Microsoft Corporation v Thong Tran Thanh FA 1653187 Forum Jan 21 2016

1.10 The disputed domain name incorporates the sole textual element of the DU ROI and device trademark omitting only the space between the words which cannot be included in domain names for technical reasons The only additional element is the

holders see e.g WhatsApp Inc v Cabir Oz WIPO Case No D2019-1046 WhatsApp Inc v Emrecan Yildirimlar WIPO Case No D2019-0895 and WhatsApp Inc v Contact Privacy Inc Customer 0153186272 / MOHD WILDAN AMIR MUSA WIPO Case No D2019-0456 There is no

represented by D.M Kisch Inc South Africa Respondent is Whois Privacy Whois Privacy enumDNS dba Luxembourg / Aleksandar Donkanic Canada self-represented 2 The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name videoplay.com is registered with

PANEL DECISION WhatsApp Inc v Sruthan Goud Case No D2019-1629 1 The Parties Complainant is WhatsApp Inc United States of America the �United States � represented by Hogan Lovells Paris LLP France Respondent is Sruthan Goud India 2 The Domain

of over 5000 domain names including but not limited to the following that include or incorporate the Complainant �s TURBOTAX Mark turbotax.com turbotax.net turbotax.org shopturbotax.com tryturbotax.com and turbotaxintuit.com The Complainant �s

LLC / Park Ave miniOrange Incorporated Case No D2019-1170 1 The Parties Complainant is Orange Brand Services Limited United Kingdom represented by Archer & Angel India Respondent is Registration Private Domains by Proxy LLC United States / Park

registered trademarks including the example cited in the factual background section above Each of these trademarks is a �Marka Mixta � in other words a mixed or combined trademark which includes both word and figurative or stylized elements

PANEL DECISION Dell Inc v Ganesh Ganga Ram Infotech Case No D2019-1213 1 The Parties The Complainant is Dell Inc United States of America �United States � represented by AZB & Partners India The Respondents are Ganesh Ganga India and Ram

PANEL DECISION Facebook Inc Instagram LLC WhatsApp Inc Facebook Technologies LLC v Perfect Privacy LLC / Milen Radumilo Hush Whois Protection Ltd Contact Privacy Inc Host Master Transure Enterprise Ltd Case No D2019-0510 1 The Parties The

disputed domain name wholly incorporates the JUMIA mark as its initial element The JUMIA mark is clearly recognizable within the disputed domain name Although the disputed domain name also includes the English dictionary word �pay � the inclusion

�s trademark See Pfizer Inc v Asia Ventures Inc WIPO Case No D2005-0256 See also Ansell Healthcare Products Inc v Australian Therapeutics Supplies Pty Ltd WIPO Case No D2001-0110 stating �The incorporation of a Complainant �s well-known

available for mobile devices including for iOS and Android operating systems and has been the recipient of numerous awards including �App of the Year � in 2011 from Apple Inc Currently available in over 31 languages the Instagram app is the 2nd

PANEL DECISION WhatsApp Inc v Carlos Rogers Case No D2019-1135 1 The Parties Complainant is WhatsApp Inc United States of America �United States � or �U.S � represented by Hogan Lovells Paris LLP France Respondent is Carlos Rogers United

PANEL DECISION WhatsApp Inc v Domain Admin WhoIs IDC Privacy Service c/o IDC BVI Limited / Jose Pedroza Case No D2019-1035 1 The Parties Complainant is WhatsApp Inc United States of America �United States � represented by Hogan Lovells Paris

registered with TurnCommerce Inc DBA NameBright.com and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names TurnCommerce Inc DBA NameBright.com has verified that Respondent is bound by the TurnCommerce Inc DBA NameBright.com registration

6 2000 Most of the trademarks include the words as part of a figurative design The Complainant �s trademarks include two US trademarks US trademark no 4808690 registered on September 8 2015 for a design including the words REDDOT AWARD and US

PANEL DECISION WhatsApp Inc v Moose Scheib Case No D2019-0541 1 The Parties Complainant is WhatsApp Inc of Menlo Park California United States of America �United States � represented by Hogan Lovells Paris LLP France Respondent is Moose

the Complaint and all Annexes including a Written Notice of the Complaint setting a deadline of April 1 2019 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint via e-mail to all entities and persons listed on Respondent s registration as

Micro Electronics Inc v Shawn Downey / Sensible.Domains Claim Number FA1902001829812 PARTIES Complainant is Micro Electronics Inc Complainant represented by David A Einhorn of Scarinci Hollenbeck LLC New York USA Respondent is Shawn Downey

PANEL DECISION WhatsApp Inc v Contact Privacy Inc Customer 0153186272 / MOHD WILDAN AMIR MUSA Case No D2019-0456 1 The Parties The Complainant is WhatsApp Inc of Menlo Park California United States of America �United States � represented by

PANEL DECISION SeatGeek Inc v Nash Enterprises Inc Case No D2019-0415 1 The Parties Complainant is SeatGeek Inc of New York New York United States of America �United States � represented by SafeNames Ltd United Kingdom Respondent is Nash

PANEL DECISION Aetna Inc v Domain Administrator / See PrivacyGuardian.org / Qian Mengdan Case No D2019-0414 1 The Parties The Complainant is Aetna Inc of Hartford Connecticut United States of America �United States � represented by The

On March 11 2019 Name.com Inc confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the elsnapchat.com domain name is registered with Name.com Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Name.com Inc has verified that Respondent is bound by

See Vertical Solutions Mgmt Inc v webnet-marketing inc FA 95095 Forum July 31 2000 holding that the respondent s failure to respond allows all reasonable inferences of fact in the allegations of the complaint to be deemed true see also Talk City

active users globally a 250 increase since 2014 who on average sent an estimated 3.5 billion Snaps every day By the end of 2017 the number of daily active users of the Snapchat App increased 8.9 million or 5 sequentially to 187 million At the end